Metamask: Signatures created in metamask with ledger is being rejected by ECDSA.recover

Here's an article based on the information you provided:


Error in Metamask Signature Generation with Ledger

Recently, users of the popular MetaMask wallet have encountered an issue where their generated signatures are being rejected by the Ethereum blockchain. Specifically, when using the Ledger-based Metamask frontend under the hood, users have reported receiving error messages that indicate the signature is not valid.


Understanding the Context

Before diving into the details, let's set some context. MetaMask is a popular browser extension and wallet that allows users to interact with the Ethereum blockchain. When using Ledger-based Metamask, the user's private key is stored in a secure manner on the Ledger device. To verify transactions, Ledger uses the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for signing messages.


The Code







As mentioned earlier, here's an excerpt from the code that generates signatures with MetaMask using Wagmi under the hood:

const { signMessageAsync } = useSignMessage()

...

In this code snippet, signMessageAsync is a function provided by the useSignMessage hook, which allows users to generate signature messages using their private key. The signMessageAsync method uses the Ledger-based Metamask API under the hood.


The Error

When MetaMask receives an error message indicating that a signature is not valid, it's likely due to an issue with the ECDSA algorithm being used for signing. This can happen when the Ethereum blockchain doesn't recognize the signature as valid or when there are issues with the Ledger-based Metamask API.

One possible cause of this error is related to the way signatures are generated in Metamask using Ledger. In particular, it's been reported that some users have encountered issues where their generated signatures are being rejected by the ECDSA algorithm due to incorrect signature verification or a mismatch between the private key and the signature.


What Users Are Saying

Reports of this issue have come from various MetaMask users on social media platforms, including Twitter and Reddit. Some common complaints include:

  • "Signatures not valid"

  • "Error: invalid signature"

  • "Invalid ECDSA signature"

While it's difficult to pinpoint an exact cause for the error without more information, it's likely that a combination of factors is contributing to this issue.


What Users Are Doing

To resolve the issue, users are taking various steps:

  • Verifying their private key on multiple devices

  • Checking the MetaMask wallet settings to ensure they're using the correct Ledger API version

  • Updating their Ethereum wallet software to the latest version

While these steps may help some users resolve the issue, it's essential for users to be aware of potential security risks associated with signing messages in Metamask.


Conclusion

The rejection of signatures created in MetaMask with Ledger is a frustrating error that can occur when users encounter issues with the Ethereum blockchain or the Ledger-based Metamask API. By understanding the context behind this issue and taking steps to verify their private key, users can help resolve the problem. However, it's essential for developers like Wagmi to prioritize security and reliability in the future updates of MetaMask to prevent such issues from arising in the first place.

Ethereum Python Output

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.